The concept of Fiscal Stimulus Packages is
essentially a Keynesian concept that states that governments, if need be can
help revive the economy out of a recessionary phase. The responsibility of
steering the economy need not necessarily be on the private businesses. The
advantage in a slowdown that the government has over the private businesses is
money: unlimited amounts of it. So does it mean that the government can keep
pumping in money whenever the economy needs it? The answer to that is
invariably no. We can only attempt to trace the effects that a stimulus package
will have on the economy but can never be sure about it.
Stimulus packages are thought to have multiplier
effects on the economy. More investment by the government means job creation.
When employment rises, it means that the income of the people in the economy is
rising. A rise in income leads to a rise in consumption which instigates the
producers to bring more to the market. And this cycle continues. If this
process works well, it instills the confidence needed to restore economic growth.
But it all comes down to where this money is being spent. The economy will take
the aforementioned path only if the government invests in productive activities.
Spending on social welfare programs provides temporary relief to the citizens
but doesn’t create any multiplier effects for the economy.
It would seem that during a recession all the
government has to do is invest in employment generating activities which have
inter linkages with other economic activities. So where lays the problem? The
biggest concern is the cost to the exchequer. Spending on a stimulus package
would be funded by additional government borrowing. The burden of that
borrowing would fall on future taxpayers.
Stimulus packages are thus only a temporary
adjustment procedure. The timing of the withdrawal of the stimulus is very
critical. Another concern with the short term measures is that they tend to
delay the reform process. If an economy needs institutional restructuring,
stimulus packages revive the economy in the short run, thus postponing that
essential process. Government’s action to fix short term problems often creates
long term damage.
If the businesses know that they will be bailed out
whenever in trouble, they will be more likely to make irresponsible choices
that produce another fiscal crunch. Thus, today’s fiscal challenges can be
taken by policymakers as an opportunity to restructure.
Nevertheless, in times of recession, private
businesses also need to restore their faith in the economic institutions of the
country. To revive faith, it becomes necessary that the government invests.
When that happens, government is in a way sending the signal that it’s not all
bad and if these investments help stir the economy, private corporations would
also catch the hint and look at expansion plans.
Contributed by:
Prerna Banga
Section A, Economics
Batch of 2013-15
No comments:
Post a Comment