Saturday 15 February 2014

CASE ANALYSIS -ARCOR: GLOBAL STRATEGY AND TURBULENCE

Globally, the confectionary industry is a highly competitive industry and attractive in the emerging and developed markets, Wherein North America and Western Europe accounted for over two-thirds of sales. The manufacturing sectors are usually located near suppliers. Industry has high transportation cost because of bulky raw materials. Chocolate and candy manufacturing is a complicated process which requires automated heavy machinery which increases investment. The consumers are more prices conscious in the emerging markets because of the low income whereas in these budding countries, for e.g. US and U.K. they are more brand sensitive. The confectionary industry has many constraints due to consumer’s different tastes and preferences in different regions.
Argentine confectionery manufacturer, Arcor Group, was already Latin America's leading candy producer and an exporter to over 100 countries. It wanted to be known for: “Good quality at affordable price”. Most of the domestic sales were from candy and chocolates, cookies brought around 25% of the sales individually. It was slowly moving out of the big cities and entering the interiors. As Argentina was facing problems because of suppliers, it started producing on its own. It started investing more so that their products reached the market, however, unlike competitors spent less on marketing.
By the end of 1990, it planned to expand in various international markets. The Argentina crisis did not only force them to rethink about global expansion but also about their domestic agenda. Foreign investors were losing confidence in the Argentinean market because of economic crisis and they started to withdraw funds. Arcor was able to fight with the external environment, however with time its sales fell drastically. Sales declined by 40% as compared to the previous year which made them rethink whether they should continue to produce at pre crisis levels. Arcor brought in changes according to their competitors, though these changes were costly, these were brought about to help the company understand the consumer behaviour. They further tightened the regulations for their retailers.
At the end of 2002, the crisis began subsiding and business was recovering. Post crisis Arcor restructured its international division adding more employees and catered to newer markets. Arcor was then analyzing how to become global with production facilities and distribution networks in various regions, such as North America, Europe, and Asia. Luis Pagani, vice president, Arcor began exploring various routes his company could follow. International plans excited him but he couldn’t ignore the crisis. Thus, he decided to maintain contacts with the global partners so that no opportunity is left unturned.
The company could explore options of globalising by either entering the Mexican market, where it can easily understand the US market, however the supplier network is well managed there which is a constraint for Arcor. They could locally tie up with the distributors and offer them to enter in markets where Arcor has a dominant share such as Latin America.
The Company could also consider the option of entering the untapped Asian market having non premium segments, price sensitive customers and where it can easily establish a good distribution network however competitor’s presence may prove to be a barrier for the company.

As there are pros and cons of entering any market, the company would have to carefully explore each opportunity and threat so that in the long run it can prove to be dominant players.

Contributed by:-

Ambika Mathur

Section C

Strategic Management

No comments: